• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Danesbury Fernery

Researching and Restoring the Danesbury Victorian Fernery

  • About
  • Volunteering
  • History
    • The House
      • Historical note – the Closure of Danesbury Hospital in 1993
    • The Families
      • A time Line – Post Fernery
    • The Fernery
      • Fern Fever
      • The Gardener
      • Pulhamite
  • Garden
    • Design Objectives
  • Location
  • Calendar
  • Support Us
    • Funding
    • Donate
    • Join us
  • Photos
    • Victorian Fernery
      • Excavation – stages
      • Garden Restoration – stages
    • Ferns
    • Wildflowers in Danesbury Fernery – Jenny’s Index
    • Local Nature Reserve
    • Butterflies/Invertebrates
    • Fungi
    • Wild Flowers – Nature Reserve
  • Reports
    • Progress
    • Visits
  • Contact
You are here: Home / History / Pulhams / Building the Fernery

Building the Fernery

29th April 2018 By John Roper Leave a Comment


In 1851 William Blake employed a highly-regarded Head Gardener Anthony Parsons. His obituary published in The Gardeners Chronicle of 1881 ³ confirmed his gardening expertise and sound judgement:  he was “successful in originating some fine new varieties of British and other Ferns, one being named in his honour Gymnogramma chrysophylla Parsoni.

When Wiliam Blake (senior) died in 1852 his son William John Blake inherited the house. He asked Head Gardener Anthony Parsons to build a Fernery in an old chalk pit about 500 metres to the East of the House, incorporating Pulhamite artificial rock work.

No papers exist to describe how the Fernery was constructed and then planted, but Pulham’s promotional catalogue of the time confirmed the construction of a ‘cave, dropping well, pass for ferns and other rockplants in an old chalk pit but in artificial stone’.

After the death of Anthony Parsons on Christmas Day 1880, and although still receiving praise in The Gardeners Chronicle of 1881, it is doubted that the Fernery will have continued to be managed on anything like the same scale for the following reasons:

  • The Fernery was not very close to the House,
  • There was a succession of new owners after 1902,
  • Constructed in a pit, it was hidden from casual sight,
  • Maintenance of the Fernery will have been labour intensive,
  • The Victorian ‘fad’ of ”Ferning’ declined with the loss of men in the Great War
  • Suitable labour will have become scarce,

 

Filed Under: Pulhams

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Earlier News

Notice of Work Parties – Thursday 19th May 2022

Weather Forecast - long range Sunny intervals and a gentle … [Read More...] about Notice of Work Parties – Thursday 19th May 2022

The Rockwork Repaired

Following the closure of The Fernery and restoration of the rockwork by Alan … [Read More...] about The Rockwork Repaired

A new Chairman for the FODF

Following the retirement of John Roper, we are delighted to announce that Sara … [Read More...] about A new Chairman for the FODF

Archives

Follow Us Online

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2022 Friends of Danesbury Fernery (FODF). Non attributed photography by John Roper.